Doctor proclaims the pandemic is a pile of horseshit without ever using the word "horseshit" or "pile".
https://principia-scientific.com/who-pc ... -positive/
WHO: PCR Tests at High CT Probably All False Positive
Published on July 19, 2021
Written by By Dr. Judy Wilyman
I have demonstrated that there was never any ‘global pandemic’ – it is only a pandemic in name.
The 2 scientific arguments that completely demolish the claim that we have a ‘public health emergency’ of COVID19 are:
1) The ‘cases’ that have been used to declare this emergency situation are healthy people without any disease symptoms.
2) The definition of a pandemic that is based only on ‘cases’ is not based on science and the adoption of this new definition in 2009 was done by elite individuals in an ‘Emergency Committee’ and without the scrutiny of the scientific, medical and general community. A scientific definition requires the scrutiny of the community otherwise it is invalid under scientific methodology.
Oh right. Dr. Wilyman. You always have such excellent sources, don't you:From the Australian Daily Telegraph
It's an unpleasant read for anyone with a heart.Judith Wilyman, an anti-vaccination campaigner and PhD student at Wollongong University, sent a letter to the Human Rights Commission and Dorey published it on her site.
Again it tore at the McCafferys' hearts.
"These programs have been promoting the whooping cough vaccine on anecdotal evidence (in particular, Dana McCaffery's death) and the mantra of 'seeing sick babies gasping for air'," Wilyman wrote.
Wilyman also suggested the McCafferys cashed in on their daughter's death because they were awarded a $1000 prize from The Skeptics, a group that continually questions the AVN. They donated the money to Westmead Hospital.
Agenda approached Wilyman for comment but the University of Wollongong media unit relayed the message that she "did not wish to speak to the media at this time".
And here she is claiming to be a medical expert despite having no medical qualifications whatsoever. From the Sydney Morning Herald
In fact, she's the perfect person for you to quote. She talks nonsense that has been thoroughly debunked by authorities that you don't recognise. However, she has been given a PhD by the same type of authorities, but this, of course, gives her arguments legitimacy.
So, on what grounds do you reject or accept the authority of an official body? If they agree with your position they're legitimate and if they don't they aren't!
Perfectly circular logic which shuts out all possibility of challenge or critical thinking.