C wrote:Part 4 keeps uptake intensity
bouncebouncebounceooooooth!
.
It has that John Lee Hooker boogie going on with fantastic overlays of sweeping guitar.
C wrote:Part 4 keeps uptake intensity
bouncebouncebounceooooooth!
.
Lord Rother wrote:And there was me thinking you'd say "Fair enough, you have a point Bob".
John aka Josh wrote:C wrote:Part 4 keeps uptake intensity
bouncebouncebounceooooooth!
.
It has that John Lee Hooker boogie going on with fantastic overlays of sweeping guitar.
Lord Rother wrote:And there was me thinking you'd say "Fair enough, you have a point Bob".
John aka Josh wrote:C wrote:Part 4 keeps uptake intensity
bouncebouncebounceooooooth!
.
It has that John Lee Hooker boogie going on with fantastic overlays of sweeping guitar.
C wrote:John aka Josh wrote:C wrote:Part 4 keeps uptake intensity
bouncebouncebounceooooooth!
.
It has that John Lee Hooker boogie going on with fantastic overlays of sweeping guitar.
Of course, they backed Hooker for a while [memo to self]
.
Lord Rother wrote:And there was me thinking you'd say "Fair enough, you have a point Bob".
John aka Josh wrote:C wrote:John aka Josh wrote:
It has that John Lee Hooker boogie going on with fantastic overlays of sweeping guitar.
Of course, they backed Hooker for a while [memo to self]
.
And are named after his Groundhog Blues.
Lord Rother wrote:And there was me thinking you'd say "Fair enough, you have a point Bob".
John aka Josh wrote:C wrote:John aka Josh wrote:
I go for Split, but wonder if I'm unduly influenced by hearing it first. For sure, it's between those two.
I always found Who Will Save the World a real disappointment
Hogwash and Solid were a great return to form
Solid is very underrated and overlooked
.
Yes, Who Will Save is a tad underwhelming - and I really wanted to love it, having been sucked in by the cover at an impressionable age.
Lord Rother wrote:And there was me thinking you'd say "Fair enough, you have a point Bob".
John aka Josh wrote:C wrote:John aka Josh wrote:
It has that John Lee Hooker boogie going on with fantastic overlays of sweeping guitar.
Of course, they backed Hooker for a while [memo to self]
.
And are named after his Groundhog Blues.
kath wrote:cherry red... ooooooooooof.
C wrote:Cherry Red is a monster!
.
LMG wrote:
Let's just say that Christ is best, and Saving The World is no small feat.
LMG wrote:John aka Josh wrote:C wrote:
I always found Who Will Save the World a real disappointment
Hogwash and Solid were a great return to form
Solid is very underrated and overlooked
.
Yes, Who Will Save is a tad underwhelming - and I really wanted to love it, having been sucked in by the cover at an impressionable age.
My first 'Hogs album, bought in the USA as a deletion for cheap.
Loved it then, loved it since.
Bomb surpasses it
Or should that be Christ surpasses it?
Let's just say that Christ is best, and Saving The World is no small feat.
Lord Rother wrote:And there was me thinking you'd say "Fair enough, you have a point Bob".
John aka Josh wrote:LMG wrote:
Let's just say that Christ is best, and Saving The World is no small feat.
We are blessed!
kath wrote:C wrote:Cherry Red is a monster!
.
reap's fave track, mwhaha.
Lord Rother wrote:And there was me thinking you'd say "Fair enough, you have a point Bob".
LMG wrote:I like Cherry Red, but I do not see it as any kind of standout track.
Just me, probably.
Thank Christ.