Corporate whore wrote:This is the first occurrence of a banning by an unelected committee that is not representative of the board.
If you don't see the danger in that, then I suddenly understand how the Patriot act got passed.
Beebsy wrote:On Captain Beefheart:God he is an annoying man. Looks like Ricky Gervais too.
Drama Queenie wrote:You are a chauvenist of the quaintest kind. About as threatening as Jack Duckworth, you are a harmless relic of that cherished era when things were 'different'.
Now get back to drawing a moustache on that page three model
funky_nomad wrote:We've been talking about this for aaaaaages over in the SPL thread...
Beebsy wrote:On Captain Beefheart:God he is an annoying man. Looks like Ricky Gervais too.
Corporate whore wrote:This is the first occurrence of a banning by an unelected committee that is not representative of the board.
If you don't see the danger in that, then I suddenly understand how the Patriot act got passed.
funky_nomad wrote:We've been talking about this for aaaaaages over in the SPL thread...
Corporate whore wrote:This is the first occurrence of a banning by an unelected committee that is not representative of the board.
If you don't see the danger in that, then I suddenly understand how the Patriot act got passed.
Dr Markus wrote:Would the scotish goverment step in or anything?
Beebsy wrote:On Captain Beefheart:God he is an annoying man. Looks like Ricky Gervais too.
Goat Boy wrote:funky_nomad wrote:We've been talking about this for aaaaaages over in the SPL thread...
It deserves a thread of its own so we cangloat overanalyse the situation
funky_nomad wrote:Jeemo wrote:They will live on in some manner but I don't think that they in a new form should get a free pass straight intpo the SPL.
Of course they will, but (and I've said this before) given the voting rights required for the SPL to accept them into the league, the "diddy" teams should be looking at making changes while Rangers are weak - first up, the 11 vote requirement for change...
funky_nomad wrote:Dr Markus wrote:Would the scotish goverment step in or anything?
Good god, no.
Aside from the obvious argument that politics and sport shouldn't mix if at all avoidable, why on earth would the SNP wish to alienate a huge chunk of the voting population when they've got a pretty big Referendum in the offing???
Drama Queenie wrote:You are a chauvenist of the quaintest kind. About as threatening as Jack Duckworth, you are a harmless relic of that cherished era when things were 'different'.
Now get back to drawing a moustache on that page three model
Dr Markus wrote:Would the scotish goverment step in or anything?

TopCat G wrote:I think any new version of Rangers should be granted immediate access into the top league. Their history and importance to Scottish football has to count for something.
Corporate whore wrote:This is the first occurrence of a banning by an unelected committee that is not representative of the board.
If you don't see the danger in that, then I suddenly understand how the Patriot act got passed.
TopCat G wrote:I think any new version of Rangers should be granted immediate access into the top league. Their history and importance to Scottish football has to count for something.
Dr Markus wrote:funky_nomad wrote:Dr Markus wrote:Would the scotish goverment step in or anything?
Good god, no.
Aside from the obvious argument that politics and sport shouldn't mix if at all avoidable, why on earth would the SNP wish to alienate a huge chunk of the voting population when they've got a pretty big Referendum in the offing???
Seems to work in Spain, they goverment/royals keep bailing out madrid out don't they?
Goat Boy wrote:TopCat G wrote:I think any new version of Rangers should be granted immediate access into the top league. Their history and importance to Scottish football has to count for something.
You could also put forward the argument they have held the game back up here.
I think a Rangers free league would be better for Scottish football in the long run.
Beebsy wrote:On Captain Beefheart:God he is an annoying man. Looks like Ricky Gervais too.
Goat Boy wrote:TopCat G wrote:I think any new version of Rangers should be granted immediate access into the top league. Their history and importance to Scottish football has to count for something.
You could also put forward the argument they have held the game back up here.
I think a Rangers free league would be better for Scottish football in the long run.
TopCat G wrote:Goat Boy wrote:TopCat G wrote:I think any new version of Rangers should be granted immediate access into the top league. Their history and importance to Scottish football has to count for something.
You could also put forward the argument they have held the game back up here.
I think a Rangers free league would be better for Scottish football in the long run.
I've just read the article you posted which made that argument very well.
What I don't understand is why it is assumed that other clubs will fill the void, after all their support is unlikely to increase, at least not for many years. Is it because they will now get a cut of Rangers' tv money? I wasn't clear on the argument.
Corporate whore wrote:This is the first occurrence of a banning by an unelected committee that is not representative of the board.
If you don't see the danger in that, then I suddenly understand how the Patriot act got passed.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users