David Bowie vs. James Brown

Do talk back

The greater artist is....

The Godfather of Soul
35
44%
The Thin White Duke
45
56%
 
Total votes: 80

The Modernist

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby The Modernist » 29 Jul 2010, 00:05

neverknows wrote:
The Modernist wrote:the more independent minded are more likely to go for Bowie.

I don't see the independence in anything you wrote about Brown - it's the same thing that's been written in every thread about him since mojo4music started out! "You've got to admit the brilliance... But he invented just one thing. He did it good, but he did it to death" and so on.


Fred I've been into James Brown for a hell of a long time, all those things you've posted I've known about for a good 25 years, I've seen him live..you're not talking to someone who doesn't appreciate him, quite the opposite I would count myself a big fan. Essentially after 69/70 he did have a variant on one style, with the ocassional detour into a slower bluesier number.
The playing on his records was insanely good -Maceo Parker, Bootsy Collins, Fred Wesley and so many more. Brown honed a whole series of bands into something that was both supertight, but also featured dizzying, fluid interlocking grooves. The result was something as muscular and sexual as music has ever got. Far from underrate that as an achievement, I rate it as high as it gets. And as a performer he was probably the best ever.
But if you're saying we should vote for him because of the artistic expansiveness and variety of his music, then I say (if I can use a quaint English parochial phrase) you're batting on the wrong wicket.

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39534
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby Count Machuki » 29 Jul 2010, 00:12

The Modernist wrote:
To be honest the default vote is for Brown, the more independent minded are more likely to go for Bowie. Not by accident has the most thoughtful post come from Leg of Lamb.
There are good reasons for voting for Brown, but I'm not convinced everyone is voting for him for the right reasons.



On BCB the default is JB? Come again?!
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
Snarfyguy
Dominated by the Obscure
Posts: 53502
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:04
Location: New York

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby Snarfyguy » 29 Jul 2010, 00:16

The Modernist wrote:
neverknows wrote:
The Modernist wrote:the more independent minded are more likely to go for Bowie.

I don't see the independence in anything you wrote about Brown - it's the same thing that's been written in every thread about him since mojo4music started out! "You've got to admit the brilliance... But he invented just one thing. He did it good, but he did it to death" and so on.


Fred I've been into James Brown for a hell of a long time, all those things you've posted I've known about for a good 25 years, I've seen him live..you're not talking to someone who doesn't appreciate him, quite the opposite I would count myself a big fan. Essentially after 69/70 he did have a variant on one style, with the ocassional detour into a slower bluesier number.
The playing on his records was insanely good -Maceo Parker, Bootsy Collins, Fred Wesley and so many more. Brown honed a whole series of bands into something that was both supertight, but also featured dizzying, fluid interlocking grooves. The result was something as muscular and sexual as music has ever got. Far from underrate that as an achievement, I rate it as high as it gets. And as a performer he was probably the best ever.
But if you're saying we should vote for him because of the artistic expansiveness and variety of his music, then I say (if I can use a quaint English parochial phrase) you're batting on the wrong wicket.

Fair enough, but I don't think anyone was saying that. Rather, it was simply pointed out that Brown wasn't completely one-dimensional.
GoogaMooga wrote: The further away from home you go, the greater the risk of getting stuck there.

Sneelock

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby Sneelock » 29 Jul 2010, 00:17

well, I take my vote back for the wrong reasons and vote for James Brown for the right reasons.
don't let it ever be said that I'm not easy to get along with.

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39534
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby Count Machuki » 29 Jul 2010, 00:18

Sneelock wrote:well, I take my vote back for the wrong reasons and vote for James Brown for the right reasons.
don't let it ever be said that I'm not easy to get along with.


JB thanks you.

Image
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

The Modernist

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby The Modernist » 29 Jul 2010, 00:20

Count Machuki wrote:
Sneelock wrote:well, I take my vote back for the wrong reasons and vote for James Brown for the right reasons.
don't let it ever be said that I'm not easy to get along with.


JB thanks you.

Image


Funky President -his best? Certainly one of them. I love the way he was really stripping things down at that point..like he wanted to get to the core of the music.

The Modernist

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby The Modernist » 29 Jul 2010, 00:22

Snarfyguy wrote:Fair enough, but I don't think anyone was saying that. Rather, it was simply pointed out that Brown wasn't completely one-dimensional.


Point taken.

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39534
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby Count Machuki » 29 Jul 2010, 00:26

The Modernist wrote:
Count Machuki wrote:
Sneelock wrote:well, I take my vote back for the wrong reasons and vote for James Brown for the right reasons.
don't let it ever be said that I'm not easy to get along with.


JB thanks you.

Image


Funky President -his best? Certainly one of them. I love the way he was really stripping things down at that point..like he wanted to get to the core of the music.


That might be a factor for both artists under discussion. At least for the Berlin stuff, Bowie was stripping back to the basics. Of course, if ever an artist was one for gilding the lily, it was Mr. Bowie. 'Going for the core' is great, though.
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
The Prof
Trading coffee in Abyssinia
Posts: 46396
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 18:32
Location: A Metropolis of Discontent

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby The Prof » 29 Jul 2010, 00:29

Magilla wrote:Bowie invented nothing.


Apart from David Bowie of course.

(and that includes Ziggy Stardust)

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39534
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby Count Machuki » 29 Jul 2010, 00:30

The Prof wrote:
Magilla wrote:Bowie invented nothing.


Apart from David Bowie of course.

(and that includes Ziggy Stardust)


I think Andy Warhol might have gotten there first...
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
The Prof
Trading coffee in Abyssinia
Posts: 46396
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 18:32
Location: A Metropolis of Discontent

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby The Prof » 29 Jul 2010, 00:33

Do you mind expanding on that?

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39534
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby Count Machuki » 29 Jul 2010, 00:43

The Prof wrote:Do you mind expanding on that?


No, not at all.
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
der nister
Posts: 15564
Joined: 30 Sep 2008, 18:42

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby der nister » 29 Jul 2010, 00:45

so its a serial wife beater vs. a bisexual cyclops that both ran tight bands, that had excellent sidemen

Brown got to grow with the eras and influence it directly, Bowie's influence was more subtle. Both aware of image dressed well, both charismatic, Brown's energy more kinetic, Bowie's cooler.

At the time of Bowie's arrival Brown was already a jaggernuat, serious competition to both Motown and the British Invasion. Bowie was still honing his chops, while Brown had notched hit after hit of stunning soul singing.

Both are lauded for avant garde periods which were based on reduction of song form: Brown had the vamp, Bowie had the drone. The introduction of which by each had the effect of closing the door on their previous work and deeming it quaint.

Both aimed for hits on AM radio . Both had two gold singles.

Both had box sets go gold.

Brown's total US sales are around 2-3 million RIAA
Bowie's US 8.5 million RIAA

Context: Steely Dan 11 million; John Denver 32.5 million; Zep 112 million

in the end it comes down to who you enjoy, both are very enjoyable

Brown has a stunning devalued soul (by his funk work)canon that is staggering in its consistency that even without the funk work Bowie cannot touch.
It's kinda depressing for a music forum to be proud of not knowing musicians.

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39534
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby Count Machuki » 29 Jul 2010, 00:47

zphage wrote:
Brown's total US sales are around 2-3 million RIAA
Bowie's US 8.5 million RIAA



Wow, really? Does that take into account the R&B charts?

In Bowie's defense, he was on Soul Train.
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
der nister
Posts: 15564
Joined: 30 Sep 2008, 18:42

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby der nister » 29 Jul 2010, 00:49

Count Machuki wrote:
zphage wrote:
Brown's total US sales are around 2-3 million RIAA
Bowie's US 8.5 million RIAA



Wow, really? Does that take into account the R&B charts?

In Bowie's defense, he was on Soul Train.


Yeah I was kinda shocked, that is from roughly 1958 onward I believe, when the RIAA started keeping count.

However, not all companies belong or are willing to do the audit for record sales, King was probably not a member.

Joni Mitchell and ELP are two others with higher profiles than sales.
It's kinda depressing for a music forum to be proud of not knowing musicians.

sloopjohnc
Posts: 63925
Joined: 03 Jun 2004, 20:12

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby sloopjohnc » 29 Jul 2010, 00:56

zphage wrote:Brown's total US sales are around 2-3 million RIAA
Bowie's US 8.5 million RIAA


Maybe Slider was right about Americans' musical tastes.
Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk!

User avatar
der nister
Posts: 15564
Joined: 30 Sep 2008, 18:42

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby der nister » 29 Jul 2010, 01:05

neverknows wrote:Do you really mean "2 to 3 millions"? There must be a mistake - how can you sell such a ridiculous amount with so many top 20 entries and number ones?


That is only verified US sales, His record company may not have allowed the auditing needed to verify real sales. This way they didn't have to properly pay Brown.
It's kinda depressing for a music forum to be proud of not knowing musicians.

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39534
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby Count Machuki » 29 Jul 2010, 01:06

zphage wrote:
neverknows wrote:Do you really mean "2 to 3 millions"? There must be a mistake - how can you sell such a ridiculous amount with so many top 20 entries and number ones?


That is only verified US sales, His record company may not have allowed the auditing needed to verify real sales. This way they didn't have to properly pay Brown.


There are multiple record labels involved. Additionally, many of his sidemen put out records that are JB in every way but in name.
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39534
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby Count Machuki » 29 Jul 2010, 01:07

sloopjohnc wrote:
zphage wrote:Brown's total US sales are around 2-3 million RIAA
Bowie's US 8.5 million RIAA


Maybe Slider was right about Americans' musical tastes.


Or is Copehead right about the invisible hand of the free market reflecting musical quality? :o
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
Matt Wilson
Psychedelic Cowpunk
Posts: 32527
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 20:18
Location: Edge of a continent

Re: David Bowie vs. James Brown

Postby Matt Wilson » 29 Jul 2010, 01:11

Machuki, are you still fighting the good fight?

Forget it. Last I checked Brown was considerably ahead, now the Dame has almost caught up.

Let them all collectively choke on Bowie's member, God knows they deserve it!


Return to “Yakety Yak”